Michelle Bailat-Jones

Writer, Translator, Reader

Having just finished my second Barbara Pym novel, No Fond Return of Love, I can safely say she is now a favorite. I will return happily to both No Fond Return of Love and Excellent Women for rereading at some point. They are easily the kind of book a person could grab off the shelf on a rainy afternoon and vanish inside the story for several wonderful hours.

No Fond Return of Love is similar to Excellent women in that it tells the story of a woman (I was going to say a young woman, because she can’t be much over thirty, but alas, she is not quite young enough and that fact lies quite firmly at the root of her troubles) who is recently disengaged from her fiancé and attends an academic conference in an attempt to forget her sorrow. At the conference, she meets two people who will greatly change the next few months of her life.

Now, I quite like books with this sort of premise, because it is exactly the people we meet under the most banal circumstances who can change our lives unexpectedly, in both good and bad ways. And Dulcie Mainwaring is greatly in need of change. Her first encounter is with another woman on the verge of inconsolable spinsterhood, Viola Dace, and then she is subsequently introduced to a very handsome academic named Dr. Aylwin Forbes. These three are thrown together over the course of the novel and Pym uses their various situations to look at her central question about the nature of happiness and how it relates to love and marriage.

On the whole, I would say that No Fond Return of Love is an easy novel. That word easy is so dangerous, I think, because it can also mean (and I have myself used it this way) to imply that the book lacks depth. This is where Pym’s strength lies. Her books appear quite light, really, and are wonderfully readable and funny. But there is an almost harrowing sorrow in all that she brings up. Her characters are laughable, but they are also suffering an acute pain.

Lilian Nattel and Litlove brought up Pym’s endings in the comments on Lilian’s post on Excellent Women. As Litlove put it, “For such a funny writer, though, she often chooses frustrating endings, or at least endings in which few people win or make headway.” This is so spot-on that I had to repeat it here. The ending of No Fond Return of Love leaves her characters at a kind of impasse, in a situation that would certainly not be considered advantageous for anyone, and yet…it feels very real. Pym deals with the notion of compromise quite openly, as if compromise is the only way to move forward in love relationships. This is quite depressing, but gets to the complicated reality that IS a relationship. This is also probably why Pym could never be considered a romantic novelist even when all of her books focus almost exclusively on marriage and love.

One last thing I wanted to mention about this particular book is the way Pym handles the narrative perspective. It is actually quite uncommon how she slips back and forth into each character’s mind, even within the same paragraph. The effect can be a little destabilizing until you get used to it, but after that it creates a really intricate mosaic. Having such direct access into the minds of all the characters makes the reader the only one who really understands all that is going on. This technique, combined with Pym’s incisive satirical voice, actually generates a lot of sympathy. Satire always risks turning a character into a stereotype, or, at the very least, into an object of scorn. But Pym sidesteps this so neatly, by bringing the reader as close as possible inside the character that what remains important is their fragility—in whatever form that takes.

9 Responses to “Barbara Pym – No Fond Return of Love”

  1. Lilian Nattel

    I’m really interested in Barbara Pym now. I agree that she is easy while going deep and has stayed with me. But even the easiness is a bit of play because the ending isn’t easy and so it stays with me as a mental puzzle.

    • Michelle

      Lilian – I am going to read her Quartet in Autumn next, as it was a Booker prize winner and perhaps not funny at all. If I’m not mistaken she published it after a long break, so I’d like to see how her writing evolved over that time.

  2. Stefanie

    Doens’t take long to become a Pym fan! 🙂 I’ve not read this one but I believe I have it on my bookshelf, waiting its turn. Glad to hear it is a good one. But then I’ve yet to meet a Pym novel that isn’t good.

    • Michelle

      I love finding a “new-to-me” author and spending time with as much of the work as possible – very happy to have discovered Pym, as it were.

  3. litlove

    How nice of you to quote me! Thank you. I was musing over what you said about the implausibility of calling Pym a romantic novelist. That’s so true. Is it perhaps because romance implies a certain idealisation at some level – even if just of our chances for happiness – and nothing about a Pym novel is idealised. We have to face ordinary insufficiencies like people’s fear of sharing their life with someone else, or compromising over the most banal of routines (which often become precious to her characters even if they are also a form of entrapment). I’m so glad you like Barbara Pym, though. I think she’s wonderful.

    • Michelle

      You are often quotable, Litlove! Your comment about nothing being idealized in a Pym novel is quite right – she has this wonderful combination of humor and lightness, but with an essentially pessimistic outlook. It makes her books funny but also thorny, and I love that mixture. Can’t wait to read further.

      • Michelle B.

        I absolutely love Barbara Pym, have read every single piece published, and enjoy NFROL the most of all her work (although there are many runners-up, Goodbye Balkan Capital included). I have read in more than one place comments rather “sniffing” at NFROL as its being one of her “weakest” works but I don’t agree – I hope one day to write a paper on it and present it to the Barbara Pym Society.

  4. sandaion

    Glad you are enjoying her, Michelle! Some people feel she is old-fashioned, but I love her precision, her care with language. My favourite is ‘Less than Angels’, partly because of my anthropology background (she makes fun of anthropologists in that one).

    • Michelle

      I’ve got Less Than Angels on my list to read – you are the second to recommend it. She does such a good job mocking academics, doesn’t she?

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: